Pond Filtration Explained
Explaining Pond Filtration: Settlement + Bio-Towers
Dear Ben,
I am currently in the middle of building a koi pond of around 2,000gallons. I am planning on using traditional settlement and wondered what flow rate and size of settlement you would advise. Would you also include brushes? And how good are trickle towers for filtration? Any information on settlement and filtration would be gratefully received.
Thank you for your query about mechanical and biological filtration. It sounds as though you have started an interesting pond project that is looking at mixing old and new approaches to koi pond filtration. Settlement is a very traditional method of removing solids effectively, and is tried and trusted, having many benefits. Meanwhile, you are also planning on combining this with a method of biological filtration that has not traditionally been married to settlement – namely trickle filtration. Usually, through ease of construction, settlement chambers lead on to wet biofiltration where the media is housed in chambers similar in construction to the settlement chambers. Incorporating a biotower is a refreshing change with several performance benefits, but also a number of related issues that you should be aware of.
The key benefit of settlement over entrapment as a means of mechanical filtration is that it doesn’t become blocked over time. Furthermore, with well-placed drains for emptying each chamber, maintenance can be both a relatively quick and easy operation. The addition of brushes can change this. True – brushes will intercept and trap finer suspended solids, but should not be necessary if the area devoted to settlement is sufficient. They can also prove a real headache for cleaning. But if you feel your area for settlement may be rather limited then the addition of brushes for added particle entrapment can enhance your filter’s mechanical function.
Trickle Towers:
Perhaps the single greatest limiting factor for biofiltration is the availability of oxygen. Biofiltration is an oxygen-demanding process with billions of aerobic filter bacteria requiring oxygen to perform their oxidative processes. There are essentially two types of biofiltration, depending on where the media is situated.
a. Below the water = wet filtration
b. Above the water = dry / trickle filtration
Trickle filtration by its very nature provides the bacteria on its media with a concentrated, readily-available supply of oxygen compared to wet filtration. This is because compared to the typical 1% oxygen being dissolved in water in submerged media, atmospheric air contains a huge 21% oxygen, making oxygen less likely to be limiting, making biofiltration consistently more effective in a trickle filter.
So as far as biofilter efficiency is concerned, trickle towers offer many benefits. However, they are for more obtrusive than their wet biofilter counterparts (which are designed and hidden along the lines of a settlement chamber). Trickle towers must sit above the surface of the pond, be pump-fed (from the final mechanical chamber) and return to the pond via gravity. The media for a trickle tower can also prove to be expensive (unless you can improvise with alternative every-day media) and to achieve effective coverage of the media, will have to design some sort of rotating spray-bar. They can also cause the pond water to cool quite significantly – a feature of so much pond water coming into contact with the air.
In summary, your anticipated combination of traditional settlement and highly efficient biotower should prove to be a very effective combination for your pond. I’m sure your koi will benefit from your planning – send us a picture when you’ve finished it!


